Historical Milestones in Measurement & Testing
2200 BC |
Chinese emperors set up civil service exams |
1115 BC |
Formal examinations were used for candidates of public office in China |
1219 |
University of Bologna employed oral & written law examinations |
1400s |
Louvain University used oral exams to place students in the following categories: Honors, Satisfactory, Charity Passes, and Failures |
1510 |
Fitzherbert (1470-1538) proposed a test of mentality consisting of counting 20 pence, telling one's age, and identifying one's father |
1500s |
During the late 1500s, Jesuits (the Catholic order founded by St. Ignatius of Loyola) uniformly adopted written tests for student placement and evaluation |
~1800 |
Written examinations were commonly replacing oral exams because of questions of fairness |
1809 |
Gross (1777-18550 developed a theory concerning errors in observations |
1845 |
Schools begin testing students in a uniform way: oral examinations were state-of-the-art. Boston was the first district to use short-answer tests throughout its schools |
1869 |
Galton (1822-1911) published Classification of Men According to Their Natural Gifts, which stimulated the study of mental inheritance and individual differences; he is considered the founder of individual psychology |
1874 |
Portland, Maine began standardized testing, based on a citywide curriculum and a test to measure whether students successfully learned it |
1879 |
Wundt (1832-1920) founded the first psychological laboratory in Leipzig, Germany |
1888 |
Cattell (1860-1944) opened a testing laboratory at the University of Pennsylvania; helped to establish the foundations of mental measurement in the USA |
~1900 |
The College Entrance Examination Board (newly organized) administered essay exams in rhetoric, Greek, and other pre-school curriculum basics to divide students among universities [achieving a better fit between prep-schools & Ivy League] |
1904 |
Pearson (1857-1936) formulated the theory of correlation |
1904 |
Spearman (1863-1936) introduced a two-factor theory of intelligence that posited a general factor (g) and specific factors (s) |
1905 |
Binet (1857-1911) and Simon (1873-1961) developed a useful intelligence test for screening school children |
1906 |
E. L. Thorndike (1874-1949) studied animal intelligence, formulated laws of learning, and developed principles of test construction |
1909 |
Goddard (1866-1957) translated the Binet-Simon Scale from French into English |
1915 |
American Educational Research Association founded |
1916 |
Terman (1877-1956) published the Stanford Revision and Extension of the Binet-Simon Intelligence Scale; with Merrill (1888-1978), in 1937 he issued a revision called the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale; other revisions were published in 1960 and 1972 |
1917 |
Yerkes (1876-1956), with colleagues, published the Army Alpha and Army Beta tests, which were group-administered intelligence tests used for the assessment of military recruits in the USA |
1923 |
Kelly (1884-1961), Ruch (1903-1982), and Terman (1877-1956) published the Stanford Achievement Test |
1920s |
The College Board began investigating the uses of MC items in college entrance exams |
1926 |
First administration of the Scholastic Aptitude Test, designed by Brigham, professor of Psychology at Princeton |
1933 |
Thurstone (1887-1955) proposed a multiple factor analytic approach to the study of human abilities |
1933 |
Tiegs (1891-1970) and Clark (1895-1964) published the Progressive Achievement Tests, later renamed the California Achievement Tests |
1933 |
Harvard University, through the efforts of President Conant and his assistant Chauncey, used the SAT for their scholarship program |
1936 |
Lindquist (1901-1978), with colleagues, published the Iowa Every-Pupil Tests of Basic Skills, later renamed the Iowa Test of Basic Skills |
1930s |
By the late 1930s, MC tests replaced most of the College Board’s essay tests |
1937 |
Bender (1897-1987) published the Bender Visual Motor Gestalt Test |
1937 |
National Council on Measurement in Education founded |
1938 |
Buros (1905-1978) published the first Mental Measurements Yearbook |
1939 |
Wechsler (1896-1981) published the Wechsler-Bellevue Intelligence Scale; revisions were issued in 1955 and 1981 under the titles Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale--Revised |
1948 |
ETS was established and could process 4,000 tests a day. Today, they can score 64,000 forms a day |
1949 |
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children was published; a revision was issued in 1974 under the titles Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children--Revised |
1950s |
Lindquist, at the University of Iowa, led the development of the optical scanner |
1959 |
Guilford (1897- ) proposed a Structure of Intellect model of intelligence based on factor analytic methods |
1969 |
National Assessment of Educational Progress initiated, testing samples of students aged 9, 13, and 17 years |
1975 |
U.S. Public Law 94-142 passed, proclaiming the right to equal education for all handicapped children |
1979 |
Judge Peckham in California ruled in Larry P. v. Wilson Riles that intelligence tests used for the assessment of Black children for classes for the educable mentally retarded are culturally biased. |
1980 |
Judge Grady in Illinois ruled in Parents in Action on Special Education v. Joseph P. Hannon that intelligence tests are not racially or culturally biased and do not discriminate against Black children |
1986 |
R. L. Thorndike (1910- ), Hagen (1915- ), and Sattler (1931- ) published the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition, in which a point-scale format replace the age-scale format of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Form L-M. |
2000 |
A federal district court upheld the Texas graduation test in GI Forum v. Texas Education Agency. The court held "While the [graduation test] does adversely affect minority students in significant numbers, the [state] has demonstrated an educational necessity for the test, and the Plaintiffs have failed to identify equally effective alternatives…. The [state] has provided adequate notice of the consequences of the exam and has ensured that the exam is strongly correlated to material actually taught in the classroom. In addition, the test is valid and in keeping with current educational norms. Finally, the test does not perpetuate prior educational discrimination…. Instead, the test seeks to identify inequities and to address them" (Phillips, 2000). |